RT RankedToolkitTrust-first reviews for AI workflow teams Research Policy
Research Policy

How we research

The research workflow behind RankedToolkit pages, including sourcing standards, citations, and content labeling rules.

What we call researched

A researched page uses public product information, provider surfaces, structured comparison logic, and explicit citations. It does not claim hands-on testing unless real test evidence exists.

  • Source product/vendor materials
  • Cross-check third-party references when available
  • Use citations for factual, non-first-party claims

What we do not fake

We do not write as if a product was tested if it was only researched or verified against docs. We do not invent reviewer identities or imply lab-grade validation that did not happen.

  • No fake testing badges
  • No fake reviewer bios
  • No artificial confidence inflation on thin pages

How researched pages differ from verified docs and field notes

Researched pages synthesize credible sources and explicit trade-offs. Verified docs pages check official docs, pricing, integration, or support materials directly. Field notes pages add documented operator observations from a real browser or runtime workflow, but they are still not presented as lab testing.

  • Researched = desk research with citations and synthesis
  • Verified docs = official source materials verified directly
  • Field notes = operator observations captured with an evidence packet
  • Tested and Expert reviewed are reserved internal states

How pages get updated

Pages are refreshed when programme availability, content quality signals, or affiliate/commercial fit changes. Significant refreshes should keep update language honest.

  • Corrections take priority over routine updates
  • Material changes should keep a visible updated date
  • If a page becomes too weak, it should be rewritten or removed from publication

Continue exploring